home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.starnet.net!wupost!waikato!not-for-mail
- From: sbh@cs.waikato.ac.nz (Stephen B Hodge)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: Amiga vs. PC
- Date: 13 Mar 1996 00:10:41 GMT
- Organization: The University of Waikato
- Sender: sbh@waikato.ac.nz
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4i53q1$1uv6@thebes.waikato.ac.nz>
- References: <rdingem.4k6k@grafix.xs4all.nl>
- Reply-To: sbh@waikato.ac.nz
- NNTP-Posting-Host: borg.cs.waikato.ac.nz
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950726BETA PL0]
-
- Ruud Dingemans (rdingem@grafix.xs4all.nl) wrote:
- : In a message of 06 Mar 96 Dave Haynie wrote to All:
- :
- : DH> Truth is, in most applications you don't need a 64-bit processor (though
- : DH> I'm sure some bozo said that about 32 and 16 bit processors years ago).
- : DH> The larger word size doesn't buy you any extra speed doing most personal
- :
- : Eh, Dave, I'm afraid I don't quite get this. I can see the
- : non-usefulness concerning the 4+ GB address space, but if it makes
- : a difference shoveling 32 bits of data in and outta memory at a
- : time (instead of 16), why shouldn't 64 bit instead of 32 make a
- : real difference?
- Because most applications only need 32bits for maths. You don't gain by using
- 64bits. Even graphics intensive stuff doesn't really need 64bits.
-
- : DH> computer things, since 64-bit integer values, and addressing beyond
- : DH> 4GBs, aren't generally of much use.
- :
- : So.. Why not? You mean not useful right now, or not useful period?
- : Inquiring minds want to know (at least it seems mine does ;)
- Address beyond 4GB may one day be useful, but generally you just don't have
- a use for 64bit maths (except floating point, which PPC has anyway).
-
- --
-
- Steve Hodge
- sbh@cs.waikato.ac.nz
- Computer Science Dept, University of Waikato,
- Hamilton, New Zealand
-
-